Main Findings from Country and Desk Studies
This report is the first effort to systematize the findings from the country studies and desk studies of the WOSCAP project. Indeed, this preliminary overview points at the complexity of processes of intervention and the multiple factors that are relevant to and may also affect the EU's interventions. Some of them are in the EU's own hands and can easily be remedied, if needed, while others are outside the EU's span of control and are more difficult to tackle. In this regard, the report shows that dilemmas are part and parcel of the EU's reality of international intervention in the field of peacebuilding and statebuilding and that these dilemmas need to be understood and analysed. The case studies show a mixed record. In several instances the EU has managed the dilemmas and local complexities well. In other cases there is still room for improvement. It is up to the next steps of the WOSCAP project to further identify both the restraints and the possibilities to improve EU capabilities with regard to conflict prevention and peacebuilding.
Read the full report here.
Georg Frerks on peacebuilding of the EU in the case of Sri Lanka.
Gert Kampman on the on-the-ground cooperation between the EU partners in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
Ben Moore on the contribution of civil society for EU peacebuilding & conflict prevention
Reflections on the project "Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding"
Ben Moore on the role of civil society in improving EU peacebuilding worldwide
A Reflection on WOSCAP in Mali
USJPB reflects on the Mali Peace Agreement (Moussa Djire)
Reflections on the EU's SSR, Multi-track diplomacy & military training interventions in Mali